the rocky defense
Man, Evidence class sure gets punchy around 5:15...Professor: The defense attorney asks the witness if he was in line for Rocky IV rather than Rocky III. The prosecutor objects. Is this relevant?
D.: It is relevant...if the witness can't tell the difference between Dolph Lundgren and Mr. T, then how can he identify the shooter?
Labels: classes, evidence, ridiculous hypotheticals
6 Comments:
Evidence, huh?
You may find the following helpful. Depending on who you have, the notes at these links may save you a lot of typing.
http://www.law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/home.html
http://law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/syllabus.shtml
Just a taste of what you'll find:
http://www.law.indiana.edu/instruction/tanford/b723/eclass/0201.html
"Judges sometimes rule correctly, sometimes incorrectly, and sometimes at random."
holy crap
Whoever you are, you are my hero.
(And yes, that 0201.html link is an exact transcript of a certain professor's Evidence slides from day 1.)
I am the scourge of lazy professors and the bane of the slothful.
All I ask is that you spread the joy with all others in your class, even the ones you don’t like. Share with all.
Subtlety is not necessary but may be desirable.
What's great fun is knowing exactly what the professor will say or do each class of the semester. Plus he goes through the slides too damn fast and needs to be punished...
Thank You annonymous! Those links will be very helpful!
Post a Comment
<< Home